Help us improve the FORRT website

Post-Hoc Power

 

REED: You Can Calculate Power Retrospectively — Just Don’t Use Observed Power

In this blog, I highlight a valid approach for calculating power after estimation—often called retrospective power. I provide a Shiny App that lets readers explore how the method works and how it avoids the pitfalls of “observed power” — try it out for yourself! I also link to a webpage where readers can enter any estimate, along with its standard error and degrees of freedom, to calculate the corresponding power.

HIRSCHAUER et al.: Why replication is a nonsense exercise if we stick to dichotomous significance thinking and neglect the p-value’s sample-to-sample variability

[This blog is based on the paper “ Pitfalls of significance testing and p-value variability: An econometrics perspective” by Norbert Hirschauer, Sven GrĂŒner, Oliver Mußhoff, and Claudia Becker, Statistics Surveys 12(2018): 136-172.] Replication studies are often regarded as the means to scrutinize scientific claims of prior studies. They are also at the origin of the scientific debate on what has been labeled “replication crisis.

REED: Post-Hoc Power Analyses: Good for Nothing?

Observed power (or post-hoc power) is the statistical power of the test you have performed, based on the effect size estimate from your data. Statistical power is the probability of finding a statistical difference from 0 in your test (aka a ‘significant effect’), if there is a true difference to be found.

Help us improve the FORRT website

We would be grateful if you could complete this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to navigation, accessibility, and content structure.
Note:All answers are anonymous and will help us make the website better for everyone!

Take the Survey