[From the working paper, āPublication Bias and Editorial Statement on Negative Findingsā by Cristina Blanco-Perez and Abel Brodeur] Prior research points out that there is a selection bias in favor of positive results by editors and referees. In other words, research articles rejecting the null hypothesis (i.e., finding a statistically significant effect) are more likely to get published than papers not rejecting the null hypothesis.
Cite
Help us improve the FORRT website
We would be grateful if you could complete this survey.
Your feedback will directly inform improvements to navigation, accessibility, and content structure. Note:All answers are anonymous and will help us make the website better for everyone!