[This post is cross-published on FHI 360’s*** R&E Search for Evidence blog***] There are many debates about the definitions and distinctions for replication research, particularly for internal replication research, which is conducted using the original dataset from an article or study. The debaters are concerned about what kinds of replication exercises are appropriate and about how (and whether) to make determinations of “success” and “failure” for a replication.
[This post is based on a presentation by Annette Brown at the*** Workshop on Reproducibility and Integrity in Scientific Research, held at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, on October 26, 2018. It is cross-published on FHI 360’s R&E Search for Evidence blog***] Two weeks ago, on Halloween, I wrote a post about how to conduct a replication study using an approach that emphasizes which tests might be run in order to avoid the perception of a witch hunt.
[This post is based on a presentation by Annette Brown at the Workshop on Reproducibility and Integrity in Scientific Research, held at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, on October 26, 2018. It is cross-published on FHI 360’s R&E Search for Evidence blog] Last week I was treated to a great workshop titled “Reproducibility and Integrity in Scientific Research” at the University of Canterbury where I presented my article (joint with Benjamin D.