The Case for Using Educational Scholarship to Improve Peer Review
Abstract
Peer review is broken. Reviewer comments often lack constructiveness, clarity, and consistency. For decades, educational scholarship has provided evidence-based, theoretically informed, and robust interventions for the provision of effective feedback. I argue, therefore, that the key to fix peer review lies within the educational literature.
Link to resource: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zak4f
Type of resources: Reading
Education level(s): College / Upper Division (Undergraduates), Graduate / Professional
Primary user(s): Student, Teacher
Subject area(s): Education, Social Science
Language(s): English
Help us improve the FORRT website
We would be grateful if you could complete this survey.
Your feedback will directly inform improvements to navigation, accessibility, and content structure.
Note:All answers are anonymous and will help us make the website better for everyone!