Signaling the trustworthiness of science
Abstract
Trust in science increases when scientists and the outlets certifying their work honor science’s norms. Scientists often fail to signal to other scientists and, perhaps more importantly, the public that these norms are being upheld. They could do so as they generate, certify, and react to each other’s findings: for example, by promoting the use and value of evidence, transparent reporting, self-correction, replication, a culture of critique, and controls for bias. A number of approaches for authors and journals would lead to more effective signals of trustworthiness at the article level. These include article badging, checklists, a more extensive withdrawal ontology, identity verification, better forward linking, and greater transparency.
Link to resource: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1913039116
Type of resources: Reading
Education level(s): Graduate / Professional
Primary user(s): student, teacher
Subject area(s): Life Science, Social Science
Language(s): English
Help us improve the FORRT website
We would be grateful if you could complete this survey.
Your feedback will directly inform improvements to navigation, accessibility, and content structure.
Note:All answers are anonymous and will help us make the website better for everyone!