Reviewer Bias Against Replication Research
Abstract
Social science journal reviewers (N=8) responded to questionnaires regarding their reviewing history, and attitudes towards and perception of replication studies. Results indicate that reviewers are biased against replication studies and toward studies demonstrating some new effects. Several reviewers indicated that replications are a waste of time and journal space.
Link to resource: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1292304227?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&imgSeq=1
Type of resources: Primary Source, Reading
Education level(s): College / Upper Division (Undergraduates)
Primary user(s): Student
Subject area(s): Applied Science, Social Science
Language(s): English
Help us improve the FORRT website
We would be grateful if you could complete this survey.
Your feedback will directly inform improvements to navigation, accessibility, and content structure.
Note:All answers are anonymous and will help us make the website better for everyone!