Reflections on Preregistration: Core Criteria, Badges, Complementary Workflows
Abstract
Clinical trials are routinely preregistered. In psychology and the social sciences, however, only a small percentage of studies are preregistered, and those preregistrations often contain ambiguities. As advocates strive for broader uptake and effective use of preregistration, they can benefit from drawing on the experience of preregistration in clinical trials and adapting some of those successes to the psychology and social sciences context. We recommend that individuals and organizations who promote preregistration: (1) Establish core preregistration criteria required to consider a preregistration complete; (2) Award preregistered badges only to articles that meet the badge criteria; and (3) Leverage complementary workflows that provide a similar function as preregistration.
Link to resource: https://doi.org/10.36850/mr6
Type of resources: Reading
Education level(s): College / Upper Division (Undergraduates), Graduate / Professional
Primary user(s): Student, Teacher, Librarian
Subject area(s): Applied Science, Life Science, Social Science
Language(s): English
Help us improve the FORRT website
We would be grateful if you could complete this survey.
Your feedback will directly inform improvements to navigation, accessibility, and content structure.
Note:All answers are anonymous and will help us make the website better for everyone!